Its images and plots were largely borrowed from mythology; its works (frescoes, sculptures, icons) were included in the system of religious cult. People who defend religion claim that it contributed to the development of art, and at the same time fertilized it with its images and ideas.
In this connection, the question arises about the relationship between religion and art, about the nature of cultural interaction in history. In the era of the dominance of religion in the spiritual life of the whole society, art often acted as a force hostile to religion, opposing it. The history of atheism and free thought is inextricably linked with the history of art.
The progressive art of the past century can be successfully applied in the education system. The main role in forming a scientific worldview among the workers of socialist society is called upon to be played only by Soviet art. The religious newspaper writes about this and much more here everything is written in detail.
The power of art lies in its clarity, in its psychological impact. With the help of art, atheistic ideas can penetrate various strata of the population. In the formation of a person, a great role is played by the development of (aesthetic) creativity for the masses, full satisfaction of aesthetic needs. Hence the importance of studying this question about the role of art in the system of atheistic education.
A scientific understanding of the relationship between art and religion is impossible without studying their further genesis. The problem of the origin of art and religion has currently caused rather heated discussions. The disputes among scientists of various specialties (ethnographers, archaeologists, etc.) on the origin of religion and art are caused by the fact that many scientists have only scattered and fragmentary facts relating to the primitive era.
Therefore, the interpretation of archaeological sources (which have come down to us in rock paintings, ornaments, objects of small sculpture, etc.) is not unambiguous and gives rise to several hypothetical judgments. Therefore, this is only one side of the matter. The other, more important, is that the whole problem of the origin of art and religion has been and remains an arena of intense struggle.
Source: carkva-gazeta.org
_